Whites refer to themselves as a curse!


A major section of the whites, especially the Europeans, claim to have descended from Japheth who is mentioned in the bible as being the son of Noah. This Noah is actually Oluiwa (Oduduwa) and Japheth is Èpè who was one of the numerous children of Oluiwa. According to Ifá, Èpè  and was born after the flood but died while still a child and so was not on the ark, therefore he could not have been the ancestor of the oyinbo aka “whites,” and when the whites were created Oluiwa’s people called them Igbo or Wilderness/Forest People. There are other arguments in support of this view.

The appellation “Èpè” was not the actual name of this son of Oluiwa but a nickname given to him by his people of Ile-Ifẹ where he was born and bred and where his father ruled as Ọlòfin. Since the whites were the last set of people to be created and they were expelled from Ile-Ifẹ for their unnatural abominations and refusal to serve Ifá, it is possibly that before, during and after their expulsion they were seen as the personification of the abstract concept “curse” or “abomination” and therefore consequently referred to as Èpè or “cursed ones”. This much has further support from biblical accounts of expulsions of certain individuals who immediately turned “white” in appearance; they mutated into Èpè.

Upon their expulsion they remained stubborn and refused to repent and began looking for other principalities and powers to serve instead of Ifá. Some of the eníyán (rejected ones) who were all cursed survived the flood and had Edi the Perverter (the Devil) as their leader thus offered to become their gods They are the described I the biblical books of Daniel and Revelations as fierce-looking, violent and strange beasts and include Muhammed and the one they hail as Alexander III the Great. As these gods are the ultimate abominations and the whites followed them, they are all cursed.

In addition, by the time the whites were created, Oluiwa had long before returned to heaven and so could not have become their ancestor in their absence. Yet another is that after the flood Olodumare created a woman called Ẹni-bi-ẹni, also known as Ninibinini, to be his wife and she bore for him sixteen children, not the trio Shem, Ham and Japheth. However, he did have other wives later, including the mother of Èpè. The only plausible explanation is that the whites deliberately excluded information about Ninibinini when forging the bible in order to try and make their story about Oluiwa having three sons look true.

While the Ọmọ Ènìyàn are the offspring of Oluiwa, who Olodumare chose to bring blessings (good tidings) to and renew Ile Aye (this world), and he is also known in Ifá as Ènìyàn, a name which means “chosen one”, it is not surprising that his own offspring who are blacks also refer to themselves as Ènìyàn. The rejected beings among the whites who are easily identifiable by their belief in white supremacy thus do to Ile Aye the opposite of the mission of blacks, and they do so knowingly, schizophrenically and with an unrepentant savior complex mentality.

Since the whites began their rebellion upon creation Edi has been using them to tempt other peoples into following them and partaking in their abominations which include their religions like Christianity, Islam and Judaism. This has been aptly described in Ifa as seen below in the excerpt from a verse of the Odu of Ifá known as Ìrẹtẹ Ogbè. Here, the Ọmọ Ènìyàn, and by implication black, yellow and red peoples are like fish who are attracted to the fishing hook that represent tools (e.g. white religions, global economic system, mass media, etc.) of the lies and abominations of their enemy Edi and his children whose desire is to consume them.

Ìrẹtẹgbè Translation
Ohun tí a bí wọn bí kìí wù wọn They are never inspired by their own historical legacy
Tẹni ẹlẹni níí yá wọn lára The ones for the others are what they catered for
A difá fún Ìwọ dẹẹrẹ Thus was divined for the fishing hook
Tíí salábàárin ẹja The close friend of the Fish

This fact is also preserved in Habakkuk 1:13-17 where the children of Edi are described as sacrificing to the same tools which are their hooks and nets and worshiping/eulogizing their tools because they do not want to acknowledge that it is not Edi but Ifá that let them punish his people.

Habakkuk 1:13 You (Eṣumare/Ọbatala) are of purer eyes than to behold evil, and cannot look on wickedness. Why do you look on those who deal treacherously, and hold your tongue when the wicked devours a person more righteous than he?14 Why do you make Ọmọ Enìyàn like the fish of the sea, like creeping things that have no ruler over them?15 They take up all of them with a hook, they catch them in their net, and gather them in their dragnet. Therefore they rejoice and are glad.16 Therefore they sacrifice to their net, and burn incense to their dragnet; because by them their share is sumptuous and their food plentiful.17 Shall they therefore empty their net, and continue to slay nations without pity?

Thankfully, some whites will see the truth and turn to Ifá (Isaiah 56). Perhaps some of these whites were originally blacks but due to white-promoted and forced interbreeding aimed at causing confusion, they reincarnated as blacks (John 8:19-23,42-47; Romans 9:6-8) – the same logic can be applied in different combinations to all groups including black, yellow and red peoples. Perhaps even those whites like Cornelius (Acts 10) who accepted salvation from Eṣumare (who is Ifá) about 2,000 years ago, and who led his people to the land of Eṣumare (re-lexified to “Aksum, “Somalia”, “Sumer”, “Shinar”, etc.), a region that included the Horn of Africa and the southwestern Arabian peninsular, before bringing them to West Africa, were also transformed into blacks. Perhaps such whites also include those who had previously been expelled but then repented (Numbers 12).

Nevertheless, some Ọmọ Ènìyàn who have become rotten beyond redemption will be expelled and their portion given to repentant whites. This much is captured in a line of the oríkì (eulogies to one’s consciousness) of Ọbàtálá who is also Eṣumare:

A fún Níní gbà fún Àìní

He who withdrew blessings from Níní (one who has) to give to Àìní (one who doesn’t have)

(Compare With Romans 9:24-26 and Hosea 1:10; 2:23)

One undeniable fact is that the white supremacists were already committing unnatural abominations before they were expelled and before Edi the dragon became their overall god. They have been doing so from their own resources ever since their beginning (John 8:42-47) and could very well have knowingly called themselves or accepted their nickname as È. It would be useful to know why they have been willing perverts.

Advertisements

Shem, Ham and Japheth are actually Ashe, Ohun and Epe


“Oluiwa” which means “ruler/epitome of character” is the title of Iwa who is none other than Oduduwa. The Amorites transliterated it to “Noah”, perhaps unknowingly since the -n- and –l– consonants are interchangeable in the evolution of languages:

(O)luiwa > Lui(w)a > Lu(i)a > Lua > Nua > Nuah > Noah

During one of his incarnations, most likely before the formation of the continents but after the great flood, he had many children as usual. According to the odu called Owonrin meji, Àshẹ, Ohùn and Èpè were the nicknames of three of them and they were born of the same mother. Given that the name “Noah” is a transliteration of “Oluiwa” and the biblical Noah is mentioned as having three sons namely Shem, Ham and Japheth, these three names must have been lifted from the records in the Ifá literary corpus concerning Oluiwa (Oduduwa). This position becomes harder to reject upon applying the technique used in this blog to illustrate how some oyinbo (Amorites) have been mischievously altering names using various means like metathesis and padding the beginning and/or end of words with consonants and/or truncating vowels at the beginning and end of same e.g. Oranfe > Ephraim, Ajaka > Isaac, Eshu > Joshua, etc.

Thus:

  • for “Àshẹ” they truncated the first letter/sound which is a vowel and padded the end with a consonant

(A)she > She > Shem or Ashe > (a)shem > Shem

  • for “Ohùn” they similarly truncated the first letter/sound and padded the rear with a consonant – note that the -n- in “Ohùn” is nasal and might not have been noticed by the identity-thieving Amorites

(O)hun > Hun > Hum > Ham

  • the Amorites have previously rendered “Japheth” as “Iapetos” and “Yepet”, so it is obvious that these variant spellings were derived by padding the beginning and end of “Èpè” with consonants

Epe > Yepet > Japheth

Epe > Iapet(os)> Japheth

Epe > Iapet(os) > Yepet > Japheth

Nevertheless, this cannot be used to verify the biblical claim about their genealogies simply for the following reasons –

  1. the names Àshẹ, Ohùn and Èpè were not their actual names but nicknames given to them by their people as a result of their activities when each of these three children began to talk. “Àshẹ” means “command”, “Ohùn” means “speech” while “Èpè” means “curse”.
  2. According to Owonrin meji, Àshẹ and Èpè were both killed not long after they started talking because of the threats they constituted to the well-being of the society – the day Èpè was born was the day Àshẹ was killed and the day Ohùnwas born was the day Èpè was killed.

Arọta lò lawo Ajímọta

Sòkòlòrò lawo òde Ìgèdè

Òòjó táa bí Èpè laa pa Àshẹ

Òòjó táa bí Ohùn laa pa Èpè

Òkúta bẹlà mọ sẹjẹ

A díá fún Ohùn tíí sọmọ Ọlọfin

A díá fún Ọlọfin níjọ tí Obinrin ẹ lóyún ojú ẹ sínú

Translation:

Arọta lo is the priest of Ajímọta

Sòkòlòrò is the priest of the city of Ìgèdè

It was on the day that Èpè was born that we killed Àshẹ

On the day we had Ohùn was when we killed Èpè

The granite breaks into halves without bleeding blood

Cast divination for Ohùn the child of Ọlọfin

Also cast divination for Ọlọfin on the day his wife was pregnant with his favourite child

Even though Ohùn was considered worse than Àshẹ and Èpè he was not killed as Oluiwa consulted his Awo (priest) who performed d’ifa (divination) to know what to do about Ohùn. He was told not to have Ohùn executed but send him away from Ile-If to a particular place eastward. He complied and sent the mother and other people, especially hunters with him for the development of a new settlement. Oluiwa later visited this place and named it Ilu Edan Ere which is now known as Idanre and it is situated in present-day southwest Nigeria.

The people of Idanre are a subset of the ọmOodua but not the ancestors of all dark-skinned peoples as the Amorites want the world to believe. It is not known whether in other incarnations Àshẹ and Èpè also had children but even if they did they would still be subsets of the mOodua not ancestors of the so-called groups like Semites and Indo-Europeans. Since the Amorites rendered the name “Eshumare” (the Saviour) as “HaShem” and Lord in the bible, and his people who are the ọmOodua are called by his name, it is worth investigating if the Amorites used this name in forging the genealogy of the fictional Shem.

  1. According to Ifa, four groups of humans were created after the flood, the first being the blacks and the last being the melanin-deficient ones aka Amorites, oyinbo, etc, and there was no curse of Canaan that allegedly turned him black.
  2. The first set of children that Oluiwa begat after the flood are sixteen in number and they do not include these three and all his children are blacks, therefore the biblical genealogies of Shem, Ham and Japheth are false.

The biblical genealogy of Noah has no scientific basis and it is known that many stories in the bible were lifted from older and original material, which, as has been argued here about the sons of Oluiwa, is none other than the Ifá literary corpus.