Identifying the incarnations of Obalufon and Iya by using as markers the (i) birth of the Redeemer and (ii) perversion by Edi


Sometime in the beginning of eniyan (human) life on this planet there lived a woman named Mọrẹmi who was married to a man named Obalufọn and both lived in Ile-Ifẹ. She had a daughter but no son which got her very worried because, in those days, each woman was expected to give birth to sons who would become the founding fathers of nations. After an Ifa consultation the message she was given seemed to have been perverted by someone who wanted her to take a wrong step. The Perverter was successful because her state of mind left her vulnerable to suggestion. This Perverter is known to the Aku (aka Omo Oduduwa) as Edi and around the world as Devil: (E)di > De(vil). Sometime later she had a son known as Ẹla which might have been during or not too long before a wasteland-dwelling people known as Igbo (the first Amorite/oyinbo race) and who had been expelled from Ile-Ifẹ for rebellion (refusing to serve the gods) began attacking, terrorizing, abducting and enslaving her people the Aku. She reacted by using her body to get information from one of the Igbo about their ways and relayed it to her people who, under the leadership of the orisha, used it to utterly defeat the Igbo and enslave some of them.

However, when she went to give thanks to the gods she had to sacrifice her son. Again, Edi was involved. Nevertheless, Ẹla who had been left for dead resurrected and ascended into heaven. Ẹla is the lamb slain in the foundation of the world (Revelations 13:8), the period just described. The points or fractals to note are that (i) the Redeemer was born to Obalufon and Mọrẹmi, and (ii) Edi perverted the divine message to Mọrẹmi.

Obalufon and Mọrẹmi are the same persons as Obalufon (Adimu) and Iya as will be explained next. (Remember that Obarese and Osere have also been identified as Adimu and Iya.)

In the garden of Eden in Ile-Ifẹ the words of Ọbatala (son of Ọlọrun) to Iya were perverted by someone, and she listened and acted on the suggestion of the Perverter. This Perverter must be none other than Edi, and, because Iya listened to him she must be a reincarnation of Mọrẹmi. Evidence of the latter can be seen in the consequent declaration by Ọbatala that Iya would bear a seed (Redeemer) who would bruise the head of the Perverter (Genesis 3).

This promise was fulfilled some millennia later when a certain Mọrẹmi (perverted by Amorites to Miriam and Mary) who was married to a man popularly known as Joseph (not actual name but a perverted version by the Amorites) bore a son who is the Redeemer but was this time named Eshu (perverted by Amorites to Yeshu, Yeshua, Jeshua, Joshua, IHCOUC, Iesous, Jesus, etc.) in the land renamed by the Amorites as Israel (yet another perverted name). His birth and eventual sacrifice and resurrection occurred at a time the Amorites (including the Hellenists, Persians and so on) had been attacking, terrorizing, abducting and enslaving his people (the Aku) who, like Mọrẹmi in the beginning, had been playing the harlot with Amorite ways and in the process began to see their bogus might and longed for Him to deal with them. Edi again tried to pervert the truth but this time his prime target was Eshu; and he failed (Matthew 4:1-11). Obviously, Joseph and Mọrẹmi are the same couple as Obalufon and Iya.

Now that the incarnations have been identified they can be listed according to order of appearance starting from the earliest:

  • Obalufon and Mọrẹmi
  • Obarese and Osere
  • Obalufon (Adimu) and Iya
  • Obalufon (Joseph) and Mọrẹmi

It is worth noting that for the past 2,000 years the Amorites have behaved like true perverts by perverting the Scriptures, world history, invading the continent they call Africa to steal resources, abducting and enslaving Negroes (including the Aku), tempting Aku, Negroes and the world in general with their perverted religions like Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These Amorites have been blaspheming seriously by referring and inducing the Yoruba to refer to Eshu as the Devil and Edi as Ọlọrun. As in the beginning when fire was used to quench them, unrepentant Amorites are to be quenched with fire. Furthermore, it is not for nothing that a people today known as Igbo who boast of being like the Amorites and in fact act like them (e.g. migrating en masse to Aku land with the aim of enslaving the Aku, claiming their land and rewriting its history) exist today.

The main source for this essay is the book titled “Myths of Ífè” by John Wyndham (1921), an oyinbo who insisted on referring to Eshu as the Devil despite being well aware of Edi’s attribute as the actual Perverter. Perhaps he did so because he did not want to admit that the “white people” spoken of by the Ife High Priests he interviewed for the book are his people.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Identifying the incarnations of Obalufon and Iya by using as markers the (i) birth of the Redeemer and (ii) perversion by Edi

  1. Oduduwa has also been around more than once and the latest was around 1,000 years ago. The proof can be seen in the establishment of the present Oba dynasty of Benin c. 12 century CE by a reincarnated Oranmiyan who comes as grandson of Oduduwa in different lifetimes. It is thus very likely that Obalufon and Moremi were around during this period as well (there is a shrine to Moremi in Kwara state of Nigeria, which some Moslems went to destroy).
    The oyinbo have been perverting Yoruba history by influencing Yoruba historians who have been through Amorite education systems to exclude ‘atunwa’ from Yoruba history, thus using them to sow confusion among Yoruba people about their identity and source. With the analysis of historical fractals the truth can be seen clearly.

    Like

  2. Please be real and authentic in your foolishness and don’t make us (Black People) look further dummy, with this outrageous baseness, non-evidence claims.

    Like

    • I guess you meant “baseless”.
      What does it mean to be “real and authenthic”? You accuse me of making claims without evidence, bit you display hypocrisy by accusing me based on no evidence but your assertions. I’ve tried to use logic to piece together the evidence available to me, despite being handicapped by the Iyami, but you have insulted me for apparently no just cause. Is this how you lead, being condescending toward those honest ones whose perspective doesn’t fit with yours?
      By the way, I’ve wanted to thoroughly update this essay for quite a while but have been waiting to be totally free of yhe handicaps.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s