Identifying the incarnations of Obalufon and Iya by using as markers the (i) birth of the Redeemer and (ii) perversion by Edi

Sometime in the beginning of eniyan (human) life on this planet there lived a woman named Mọrẹmi who was married to a man named Obalufọn and both lived in Ile-Ifẹ. She had a daughter but no son which got her very worried because, in those days, each woman was expected to give birth to sons who would become the founding fathers of nations. After an Ifa consultation the message she was given seemed to have been perverted by someone who wanted her to take a wrong step. The Perverter was successful because her state of mind left her vulnerable to suggestion. This Perverter is known to the Aku (aka Omo Oduduwa) as Edi and around the world as Devil: (E)di > De(vil). Sometime later she had a son known as Ẹla which might have been during or not too long before a wasteland-dwelling people known as Igbo (the first Amorite/oyinbo race) and who had been expelled from Ile-Ifẹ for rebellion (refusing to serve the gods) began attacking, terrorizing, abducting and enslaving her people the Aku. She reacted by using her body to get information from one of the Igbo about their ways and relayed it to her people who, under the leadership of the orisha, used it to utterly defeat the Igbo and enslave some of them.

However, when she went to give thanks to the gods she had to sacrifice her son. Again, Edi was involved. Nevertheless, Ẹla who had been left for dead resurrected and ascended into heaven. Ẹla is the lamb slain in the foundation of the world (Revelations 13:8), the period just described. The points or fractals to note are that (i) the Redeemer was born to Obalufon and Mọrẹmi, and (ii) Edi perverted the divine message to Mọrẹmi.

Obalufon and Mọrẹmi are the same persons as Obalufon (Adimu) and Iya as will be explained next. (Remember that Obarese and Osere have also been identified as Adimu and Iya.)

In the garden of Eden in Ile-Ifẹ the words of Ọbatala (son of Ọlọrun) to Iya were perverted by someone, and she listened and acted on the suggestion of the Perverter. This Perverter must be none other than Edi, and, because Iya listened to him she must be a reincarnation of Mọrẹmi. Evidence of the latter can be seen in the consequent declaration by Ọbatala that Iya would bear a seed (Redeemer) who would bruise the head of the Perverter (Genesis 3).

This promise was fulfilled some millennia later when a certain Mọrẹmi (perverted by Amorites to Miriam and Mary) who was married to a man popularly known as Joseph (not actual name but a perverted version by the Amorites) bore a son who is the Redeemer but was this time named Eshu (perverted by Amorites to Yeshu, Yeshua, Jeshua, Joshua, IHCOUC, Iesous, Jesus, etc.) in the land renamed by the Amorites as Israel (yet another perverted name). His birth and eventual sacrifice and resurrection occurred at a time the Amorites (including the Hellenists, Persians and so on) had been attacking, terrorizing, abducting and enslaving his people (the Aku) who, like Mọrẹmi in the beginning, had been playing the harlot with Amorite ways and in the process began to see their bogus might and longed for Him to deal with them. Edi again tried to pervert the truth but this time his prime target was Eshu; and he failed (Matthew 4:1-11). Obviously, Joseph and Mọrẹmi are the same couple as Obalufon and Iya.

Now that the incarnations have been identified they can be listed according to order of appearance starting from the earliest:

  • Obalufon and Mọrẹmi
  • Obarese and Osere
  • Obalufon (Adimu) and Iya
  • Obalufon (Joseph) and Mọrẹmi

It is worth noting that for the past 2,000 years the Amorites have behaved like true perverts by perverting the Scriptures, world history, invading the continent they call Africa to steal resources, abducting and enslaving Negroes (including the Aku), tempting Aku, Negroes and the world in general with their perverted religions like Christianity, Islam and Judaism. These Amorites have been blaspheming seriously by referring and inducing the Yoruba to refer to Eshu as the Devil and Edi as Ọlọrun. As in the beginning when fire was used to quench them, unrepentant Amorites are to be quenched with fire. Furthermore, it is not for nothing that a people today known as Igbo who boast of being like the Amorites and in fact act like them (e.g. migrating en masse to Aku land with the aim of enslaving the Aku, claiming their land and rewriting its history) exist today.

The main source for this essay is the book titled “Myths of Ífè” by John Wyndham (1921), an oyinbo who insisted on referring to Eshu as the Devil despite being well aware of Edi’s attribute as the actual Perverter. Perhaps he did so because he did not want to admit that the “white people” spoken of by the Ife High Priests he interviewed for the book are his people.


Obarese and Osere probably reincarnated as Obalofun (a.k.a Adimu) and Iya

Obarese is one of the revered Aku (aka Omo Oduduwa) ancestors. He had many powers like the ability to conjure rain but something once happened to him that was quite remarkable when he descended from heaven to Ile-Ife. His elder brother known as Oranfe who controls thunder and brings fire from his mouth and is said to have descended from heaven at the same to Ile-Ife, wanted him to leave his domain (Ife) because of his (Obarese) powers. After an Ifa consultation Oranfe told Obarese he would have a wife so he slapped his younger brother’s rib and created a woman named Osere therefrom as his wife.

The couple then left Oranfe’s domain and after some stops they arrived hungry at their destination but this was during the cold and dry harmattan season that is characterized by no rainfall and the ground being too dry for planting. After praying to Olodumare and carrying out a ritual the yam he planted grew in 3 days and they ate. He also planted a palm wine tree and tapped palm wine from it the same day. Not surprisingly there were other wonders that he performed even at other towns and at Ile-Ife whose inhabitants pleaded with him to cause rainfall.

One day they received as guest an elderly woman who originally is a young woman. She stayed with them overnight but the following day she did not come out of her room. So they opened it themselves only to discover that the room she slept in was filled with wealth and Osere who was filled with shock slammed the door shut following which Obarese in anger cursed her.  When the door was opened again the guest came out but as a young woman.

These events are historical fractals and are repeated in the life of Obalufon and Iya as explained next.

When it was time for another phase of creation Obalufon and Iya were created at an place in Ile-Ife named after Yemoja in Ile-Ife by Obatala who is son of Olorun (Olodumare). Since Iya is the name that the Amorites rendered as Eve, Obalufon must be the same person referred to by the Amorites as Adam, the Oyo-Aku as Adimu, and perhaps the Awori-Aku as Adamu.

In the perverted version of the Scriptures as published by the Amorites it is mentioned that Iya was created from the rib of Adimu by God. Therefore, Adimu/Obalofun is the same person as Obarese, Iya is Osere and Oranfe is Obatala. Since both were born at Yemoja in Ile-Ife and the garden of Eden is located eastward of their place of birth as described in the Scriptures, Eden must be located east of Yemoja but in Ile-Ife.

After a while Iya was ‘cursed’ with pain, just as Osere, and Obatala told both Iya and Obalufon to leave the garden which was in his domain of Ile-Ife, just as Oranfe did to Obarese and Osere. Also, Obatala told Obalufon that he would till the ground in toil, which is the same situation Obarese encountered upon arriving at his destination away from Oranfe’s domain of Ile-Ife.

This analysis is yet another proof of atunwa (‘we come again’ a.k.a reincarnation). Oranfe is the same person as Aramfe whose weapons are of thunder and lightening, and is most likely the same person as Jakuta who uses same. That Obarese and Osere had special powers unlike Adimu and Iya, the former must have incarnated at a time when the gods dwelt in Akuland with knowledge and use of all their powers but then reincarnated as the latter having forgotten their past and living fully as men. The period of the earlier incarnation must have been included in the original Scriptures but cut out by the Amorites for their purpose of perversion (they deliberately did not publish all of the Qumran Scrolls for instance). Another observation has to do with the claim by Oyo that Adimu was the child of a slave that was about to be sacrificed. Oyo makes this claim in order to legitimize her claim of ascendancy over Oyo. However, this revelation that Adimu is Obalufon implies that Aku history according to Oyo has to be carefully scrutinized.

Note that there is another earlier and later incarnation of this couple. Watch out for my next post!


  • The Story of Orisa Obarese: The God of Rain –  (2011)
  • Myths of Ife – John Wyndham (1921)
  • The Yoruba Speaking Peoples Of The Slave Coast Of West Africa – A.B. Ellis (1894)

The other Eshu in Aku (Omo Oduduwa) history

From the versions of bible texts as published by the Amorites the Redeemer was born to his people the Aku ( aka Omo Odududuwa) around 2,000 years ago. Then, His name was Eshu (also written/pronounced as Èṣú and ÈŠÚ) which the Amorites pretending to be Semites write as Yeshu, Yeshua, etc. while the Hellenist Amorites replaced the name with IHCOUC (IeZeus, Iesous, Jesus) which is a modification of Zeus the name of their chief god. There was another person whose life was recorded in bible texts who the Amorites admit had the same name as the Redeemer but which was also mischievously edited. They allege that this person was the son of Nun of the tribe of Ephraim and assisted Moses as their people were led out of ancient Egypt that had been colonized by the Hyksos who are Amorites and his name is recorded in bible texts published by Hellenist Amorites as Joshua and by the pretender Semites as Yeshua (Exodus 32:17; Numbers 12:16-14:38; Book of Joshua).

The Hellenists spread their false religion of the Prince of Greece called Christianity around the world, lying about the Redeemer’s name and publishing in their bibles two deviant versions of His name – Joshua in the ‘old’ testament and ‘Jesus’ in the ‘new’ and the fraudulent Greek Septuagint. Till date they have not been able to explain this discrepancy despite stupidly arguing that both have the same meaning. Perhaps they want the world to believe that the name evolved from ‘Joshua’ to ‘Jesus’. A reason for the discrepancy could be that the books of the ‘old’ testament were plagiarized and mutated by the ancient Greeks who initially colonized the Promised Land, and those of the ‘new’ testament and apocrypha were treated likewise by the ancient Romans who took over. Hence, strange names and different writing styles are seen in the latter as against the former. (The Romans placed a lot of emphasis on oratorical skills and embellished writing as seen in the academia till date, a foolish legacy used to promote class differentiation and supercilious attitudes by those who attend(ed) formal/Amorite education systems.)

The name Eshu is the theophoric part of compound Aku names like Eshubiyi, Eshutosin, Eshuyemi, Eshutosin, etc., any of which could have been of the biblical Joshua who is really Eshu Laalu. Interestingly, by leading his people into the Promised Land he played a role very similar to the Redeemer’s. While the Redeemer led the people spiritually into the Promised Land the son of Nun was His physical representative. This becomes more obvious when it is noted that, Moses, just like Olodumare, did not lead them into the Promised Land (the kingdom prepared by the Olodumare for the Redeemer), and Olodumare told Moses that he would be as God to his people (Exodus 4:16; 34:29-35) implying that Eshu Laalu who was/is always with Moses was like the Redeemer who is always with Olodumare (compare Exodus 17:8-14; 23:20-23; 32:34; 33:7-11;and Deuteronomy 18:15-19 with Deuteronomy 31:1-15).

The identification of Joshua the son of Nun as Eshu Laalu in the Ifa literary corpus would go a long way in getting the correct names of the festivals, and the nations Israel and Egypt/Misri.

There may yet be another person likewise named Eshu (written mischievously as Jeshua and Joshua) who lived during the time of Babylonian-Persian subjugation of Judah and whom Olodumare ordained as High Priest. He is referred to in

  • 1 Chronicles 24:11; 31:15
  • Ezra 2:2,6,36,40; 3:2,:8-10,18; 4:3; 5:2; 8:33
  • Nehemiah 3:19; 7:7,11,39,43; 8:7,17; 9:4-5; 11:26; 12:1,7-10,24-26

I don’t yet know if he is the same (reincarnated/atunwa) person as the Eshu Laalu of the Exodus, but, just like this Eshu assisted Moses and physically led his people into the Promised Land, he assisted Zerubabbel and was used to lead his people back into their Land from captivity in addition to receiving symbolically from Olodumare the Ash (authority) just like the Redeemer (Zechariah 3; 6:9-15; Book of Haggai). This analysis is based on seeing the lives of individuals as historical fractals and, if the assistants of Moses and Zerubabbel are the same person, the implication is that Moses is the same person as Zerubabbel. Perhaps their destinies are just similar.

However ludicrous this might seem to some people, there’s more to come in a future post on this blog about historical fractals which will be used to expose further the trait of perversion carried by the Amorites.

Furthermore, the Amorites claim that the name Jeshua is also derived from Yeshua and same as Joshua. If their motives were honest, they could have told Christians to pray in the names Joshua and Jeshua in addItion to Jesus.

Ifa proves the existence of historical fractals

Below is a YouTube video, uploaded by funanvatamalongo (Tata Jose Castro) on October 19, 2012, of an interview with an elder Ifa priest, Oluwo Solagbade Popoola, conducted by Jose Castro and Meibrin Parraga of Makaba 9 Radio and with Ifa as the topic. During the interview the Oluwo mentions that one of the two ways on which Ifa is based is the repetition of history, which is proof to Ifa devotees that may have had doubts about the validity of my essay about the existence of historical fractals for understanding world history.  (Some of my posts have been quite controversial, which I hope to address soon, but I urge readers to consider the merits and demerits of the ones about historical fractals.)

The part where this is mentioned is from 8.18 – 8.59

Here’s the relevant section of the transcript:

Ifa works in two major ways only. The first one is history repeats itself. Whatever happened thousands of years ago, if it happens again today, and if we use the same materials that were used thousands of years ago we are going to get the same result. That is the first principle under which Ifa works.

This is in agreement with my observations about Ifa which I will now describe.

Right from the first moment of creation till date patterns have been established and are repeated throughout the universe even from the lives of galaxies to the smallest particles. According to the story of creation as recorded in Ifa, there was a lot of entropy (disorder) at the beginning which Olodumare put an end to by establishing the pattern of anti-clockwise motion found all over the universe as seen for instance in the motion of galaxies. Thus, order was established after a period of disorder, a pattern that has been observed in biological systems including man. During the foundation of the earth, when Olodumare began the creation of humans and immediately afterward, certain events (itan/stories) took place which over time has been repeated and the lives of humans have been after the pattern of those events. These events are recorded in the Ifa literary corpus and are used whenever Ifa devotees desire to d’ifa or consult with the divine – during the d’ifa the querent makes his/her request known to Olodumare via Eshu who sees everything (not the oyinbo concept of a cyclops with one eye that they refer to as ‘all-seeing eye’; Eshu does not have one eye like cyclops) and returns with the approved message encoded as binary odu marks which the babalawo interprets according to the associated itan. The devotee is expected to trust and obey the message and apply the lessons therefrom. Just as fractals have the same features as the scale changes in size, these itan are applicable to the family, community, nation and the world. Thus, all the events taking place around the world are not strange but some people want to deceive others into believing otherwise so they can carry out their nefarious activities unnoticed and deceive people into partaking in their rebellion against Olodumare.

The existence of historical fractals proves the existence of intelligent design and Olodumare as the author, is evidence of the truth of atunwa (reincarnation), shows the error of Amorite-inspired rebellious behavior like atheism, perversions, etc., and exposes the version of world history generated and propagated by Amorites as deliberately false with the aim of entrenching their soon-to-be-extinct world domination. These lies about world history are taught especially in the field of anthropology and linguistics and are used to dismiss the truth as recounted by various indigenous melanin-rich peoples as spurious mythology and unscientific. While the Amorite leaders have been learning from the past to entrench mental slavery of blacks among other evils they have been lying to the world that atunwa is unscientific and false, in order to prevent people from seeing the connections that show they are the same people rebelling and deceiving others to rebel against Olodumare.

Those who have been seeking the truth about creation and the truth can analyze various historical events as fractals and they will see clearly the deception in this world. However, those in the academia might find it difficult to promote and publish their findings as such would be considered by the establishment as threats to their positions, hence the need to escape/resign from them. Everyone who wants to live truthfully will have to learn from the past and leave their false lives in this world, however hard it that might be.

Biblical Sarah and the Agbon Festival in Ile-Ife (Part 2)

Here, the connection between the goddess Osara and the biblical Sarah will be discussed. For Part 1 kindly visit this link.

A useful way of determining whether or not Osara and Sarah are the same person is to compare certain itan (stories, events) in their lives that stand out and then determine whether or not their themes are consistent and repetitive. If yes, the implication is that such repetitive itan – a fact of Ifa – are fractals and unique to Osara and Sarah, like a signature that goes way beyond their DNA to their Ori (consciousness).

Once upon a time, probably before the creation of Adimu/Adamu and Iya, the gods including Oduduwa, Osara and Olokun lived as gods among the Aku people in Ile-Ifẹ. Olokun was married to Oduduwa but had no child so she persuaded him to marry Osara her friend who then gave birth to Okanbi. After some time rivalry developed between both wives as Olokun remained childless while Osara gave birth to a son named Okanbi. Eventually she left the home for Osara.

Many years later, after the global deluge, was the beginning of a another era marked by the birth of the irunmoles to man to live among man as orishas (sort of like special role models). According to the biblical texts mutated by the Amorites, Oduduwa (Abraham/Ibrahim is a name fabricated by some very deranged oyinbo aka Amorites) was the first of the gods to be born as a man to be the progenitor of the Aku people. Each time he is always the progenitor. The biblical Sarah was married to Oduduwa but was childless for quite a while. Most likely, her childlessness was because of the way she treated Olokun in the aforementioned previous lifetime. Unsurprisingly, she encouraged Oduduwa to have a child by Hagar their Egyptian (the people labeled by the oyinbo as Bantu are the true Egyptians) maidservant who then bore him a son named Ishmael. After a while Osara began to receive from Hagar the same treatment she (Osara) gave to Olokun but, unlike Olokun, she stayed put while Hagar had to leave. Eventually, she bore a son named Ajaka (not Isaac) who is Okanbi and was Oduduwa’s heir. Also, Okanbi sired Ọranmiyan.

The patterns discernible from the above are:

  • Osara is always the wife of Oduduwa which is further proof that the name Abraham is deceitful (Hint: the ‘ham’ in ‘Abraham’ is actually ‘wa’; strike out the ‘m’ and compare the meaning of ‘wa’ in Yoruba names/titles like Oluwa and compare with the meaning of ‘Ham’ as speculated by the Amorites).
  • Osara has been the mother of Oduduwa’s heir. Perhaps it is because when she and Olokun were asked to perform sacrifices to bear children she obeyed but Olokun did not. (After some time Ọrunmila the Oyigiyigi (Rock of Ages) performed a big sacrifice for Olokun and she got her heart’s desire.)
  • Ọranmiyan a.k.a. Aku (not Yakub) has been heir to Okanbi/Ajaka and son of Osara.

It is very obvious that the name Sarah is actually Osara as pronounced by the Aku and Ile-Ifẹ is the city of the gods. The re-incarnation points to the importance of applying suuru (patience) to do to others as we want done to ourselves, develop iwa pẹlẹ (gentle character), not react unnecessarily harshly and carry out acts of vengeance, and not fight against our ori.